Chandler v. STERN DENTAL LABORATORY COMPANY
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CARL O. BUE, Jr., District Judge.
In this action plaintiffs, as holders of a patent on a teeth protector, the Featherbite, seek to recover damages allegedly resulting from violations of the antitrust laws and patent laws by the defendants. The defendants include, among others, the original licensee of the patent (Harold L. Stern), its assignee (Featherlax Corp.), the principal directors, officers, and agents of the assignee corporation; the packager of plaintiffs’ teeth protector, and a competitor (Custom Made, Inc.). There is no diversity of citizenship between the parties…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Anderson's-Black Rock, Inc. v. Pavement Salvage Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Productive Inventions, Inc., a Corporation v. Trico Products Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Hensley Equipment Company, Inc. v. Esco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Regents of the University of Minnesota v. Medical Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Mutchnik v. M. S. Willett, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Sing v. Culture Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1979