Valmont Industries, Inc. v. Yuma Manufacturing Company
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM E. DOYLE, District Judge.
This is a patent infringement action, wherein the plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment that U. S. Patent No. 2,604,359 is valid and infringed by the defendants, an injunction against further infringement and an accounting. 1 In the original complaint and subsequent amendments, the plaintiffs have charged both defendants with infringement of claims 8, 9, 10 and 13 of U. S. Patent No. 2,604,359; defendant Enresco with actively inducing infringement of U. S. Patent No. 2,604,-359 by licensing to Yuma the right to manufacture and sell…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- International Salt Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lens Crafters, Inc. v. Vision World, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
- Ansul Company v. Uniroyal, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Riverton Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- General Tire & Rubber Co. v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1972
- Avant, Inc. v. Tech Ridge, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.