Legal Opinion

Valmont Industries, Inc. v. Yuma Manufacturing Company

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided March 6, 1969No. Civ. A. 67-C-136, 67-C-331PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

WILLIAM E. DOYLE, District Judge.

This is a patent infringement action, wherein the plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment that U. S. Patent No. 2,604,359 is valid and infringed by the defendants, an injunction against further infringement and an accounting. 1 In the original complaint and subsequent amendments, the plaintiffs have charged both defendants with infringement of claims 8, 9, 10 and 13 of U. S. Patent No. 2,604,359; defendant Enresco with actively inducing infringement of U. S. Patent No. 2,604,-359 by licensing to Yuma the right to manufacture and sell…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. International Salt Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lens Crafters, Inc. v. Vision World, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
  2. Ansul Company v. Uniroyal, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  3. Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Riverton Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  4. General Tire & Rubber Co. v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1972
  5. Avant, Inc. v. Tech Ridge, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API