Legal Opinion

Foshee v. Republic National Bank of Dallas

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1981No. B-9619PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the court of civil appeals which affirmed a. summary judgment for respondents. Petitioners Clinton and Mary Foshee (Foshee) are the Independent Executors of the Will of Bernice Schlosberg. Respondent, Republic National Bank of Dallas, (Republic) is Trustee of the Hillcrest Mausoleum Special Gifts Trust Fund and also the Trustee of the Hillcrest Mausoleum Perpetual Care Fund. The Attorney General is a respondent because a charitable trust is alleged to be involved.1

The issue before us is whether a portion of Mrs. Schlosberg’s Will which…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Boyd v. Frost National Bank of S.A.Texas Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Moss v. HelsleyTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Kettler v. AtkinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Henderson, Extr. v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Atkinson v. KettlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Peveto v. StarkeyTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Larrumbide v. Doctors Health Facilities, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
  3. Johnson v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. Salisbury v. Ameritrust Texas, N.A. (In Re Bishop College)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1993
  5. Hamman v. Bright & Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API