Legal Opinion

Hamman v. Bright & Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided May 15, 1996No. 07-93-0245-CVPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DODSON, Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment. Appellants, the Hammans,1 request *170that we reverse the trial court’s determination that certain oil and gas top leases violate the Texas constitutional rule against perpetu-ities (the Rule). By cross-points, Bright,2 Shell Western E & P, Inc. (Shell) and Atlantic Oil Corporation (Atlantic), the appel-lees/cross-appellants, request that we reverse the trial court’s determination that the perpetual non-participating free royalty interest (NPRI) reserved in a certain deed, was not subject to the Rule. We decline in each instance, and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. McConnell v. Southside Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Sun Oil Co. (Delaware) v. MadeleyTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Luckel v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Murphy v. DilworthTexas Supreme Court · 1941

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. BP America Production Co. v. Laddex, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2017
  2. BP America Production Company v. Laddex, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2015
  3. Bright Co. v. HammanTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. August Meduna, Jr. v. Ruth Holder, Guardian of the Person and Estate of Minnie Meduna, N.C.M., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
  5. August Meduna, Jr. v. Ruth Holder, Guardian of the Person and Estate of Minnie Meduna, N.C.M., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API