Hamman v. Bright & Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
1Opinion of the Court
DODSON, Justice.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment. Appellants, the Hammans,1 request *170that we reverse the trial court’s determination that certain oil and gas top leases violate the Texas constitutional rule against perpetu-ities (the Rule). By cross-points, Bright,2 Shell Western E & P, Inc. (Shell) and Atlantic Oil Corporation (Atlantic), the appel-lees/cross-appellants, request that we reverse the trial court’s determination that the perpetual non-participating free royalty interest (NPRI) reserved in a certain deed, was not subject to the Rule. We decline in each instance, and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- McConnell v. Southside Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Sun Oil Co. (Delaware) v. MadeleyTexas Supreme Court · 1981
- Luckel v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Murphy v. DilworthTexas Supreme Court · 1941
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- BP America Production Co. v. Laddex, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2017
- BP America Production Company v. Laddex, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2015
- Bright Co. v. HammanTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- August Meduna, Jr. v. Ruth Holder, Guardian of the Person and Estate of Minnie Meduna, N.C.M., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
- August Meduna, Jr. v. Ruth Holder, Guardian of the Person and Estate of Minnie Meduna, N.C.M., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.