Legal Opinion

State v. Brooks

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 11, 1997No. 2 CA-CR 97-0050-PRPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRAMMER, Judge.

Pursuant to a plea agreement, petitioner was convicted in 1995 of attempted unlawful transfer of a narcotic drug. He was sentenced to the presumptive term of three and one-half years’ imprisonment. He then filed a petition for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 32, Ariz.R.Crim.P., 17 A.R.S., claiming the trial court improperly refused to grant him 227 days of presentence incarceration credit against his sentence. This petition for review followed the trial court’s summary dismissal of the Rule 32 petition.

Petitioner was arrested and jailed on the instant drug…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. Cruz-MataArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. San MiguelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  3. State v. De PassqualloArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State of Arizona v. Brandon Albert SeayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API