Legal Opinion
Miller v. Hygrade Food Products Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 29, 2001No. CIV. A. No. 99-1087PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
REED, Senior District Judge.
Currently before the Court is the renewed motion of plaintiffs James C. Miller, Ralph Brown, Vincent Gray, Charles Knight, Michael Jones, Harold G. Williams, Jerry Hemingway, Barry C. James and Dwayne Jackson for class certification pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure' 23, (Document No. 53), the response by Hygrade Food Products Corporation (“Hygrade”), the reply, and the supplemental briefs thereto. This law suit arises out of claims brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964' (‘Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq., as amended by…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Reid v. Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2001
- Rockey v. Courtesy Motors, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2001
- Allen v. Holiday UniversalDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Bacon v. Honda of America Mfg., Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001
- Adler v. Wallace Computer Services Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.