Legal Opinion

Pule v. Macomber

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided September 8, 2021No. 1:17-cv-00193Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI‘I CHARMAYNE PULE., et al., Case No. 17-cv-00193-DKW-KJM Plaintiffs, ORDER REMANDING ACTION v. TO STATE CIRCUIT COURT FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER BOBBY L. MACOMBER, et al., JURISDICTION Defendants. This matter comes before the Court following briefing on matters related to the Court’s jurisdiction over both certain claims alleged by the parties and this case generally. Having reviewed the same, as well as the other filings in this case, the Court finds that original jurisdiction did not exist over this case when it was removed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Arco Environmental Remediation, L.L.C. v. Department Of Health And Environmental Quality Of The State Of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API