Legal Opinion
Byrne v. B. McGrath
California Supreme Court
Decided October 26, 1900No. Sac. No. 646PublishedCited by 18 opinions
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Nevada County, and from an order denying a new trial. F. T. Nilón, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Appeal from judgment for defendant, and from order denying plaintiffs’ motion for new trial. The appeal from the judgment was taken more than six months after the entry of judgment, and must be dismissed. The cause was before this court on a former appeal (Byrne v. Byrne, 113 Cal. 294), and is thus stated in the report of the case:
“Plaintiffs, who are the children of Michael Byrne, Jr., deceased, commenced this action against the administratrix of his estate and the creditors thereof, seeking a decree that certain property which had come into the possession of the administratrix as…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lathrop v. BamptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Byrne v. ByrneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by18 opinions
- Estate of Dutard v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Estate of ArmsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- City of Lincoln v. MorrisonNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
- Ralls v. RallsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Brown v. Town of SebastopolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.