Legal Opinion
Rosenfield v. Campbell
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided July 12, 1925No. 8611PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PLEASANTS, O. J.
This is an application for mandamus, presented by relator, to require the respondent, who is judge of the district court of the Eightieth judicial district to hear and determine a motion for contempt filed in the case of Rosenfield v. Seif-ert, which is pending in the district court for the Sixty-First judicial district, and presented to respondent for hearing.
The following are in substance the allegations of the application which is duly verified by the oath of the relator. In a suit brought by relator against J. W. Seifert and M. W. Seifert in the Sixty-First district court…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Conley v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1913
- State ex rel. Happel v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1909
- City of Palestine v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Cattlemens Trust Co. of Ft. Worth v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- In Re GrossmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ex Parte BirminghamTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- Browning-Ferris MacHinery Co. v. ThomsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Berry v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Blair v. BlairCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Zale Corp. v. E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.