Conley v. Anderson
Texas Supreme Court
Original application by A. B. Conley for a writ of prohibition and. an injunction against W. S. Anderson, Judge of the Thirty-Seventh Judicial District, and others.
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, C. J., and PHILLIPS, J.
[1] In the case of A. B. Conley et al. v. Daughters of the Republic, 156 S. W. 197, decided April 30, 1913, it was held by this court that under the authority of the act of the Thirty-Second Legislature (1st Called Session) the plaintiff in error Conley, Superintendent of Public Buildings and Grounds, was entitled to enter upon that part of the Alamo property known as the Hugo & Schmelzer Company property and expend in its improvement, upon the approval of the Governor, the sum of $5,000, appropriated by the act for that purpose; that the act was not in conflict…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Conley v. Daughters of the RepublicTexas Supreme Court · 1913
- Hovey v. ShepherdTexas Supreme Court · 1912
- State ex rel. Wolferman v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Armstrong v. PooleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1888
- Millaudon v. M'DonoughSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Staples v. State Ex Rel. KingTexas Supreme Court · 1922
- Edgewood Independent School District v. KirbyTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Phillips v. BramlettTexas Supreme Court · 2013
- City of Dallas v. DixonTexas Supreme Court · 1963
- City of Houston v. City of PalestineTexas Supreme Court · 1924
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.