Legal Opinion
Richardson v. Luther
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 16, 1988No. Civ. No. B-88-176 (TFGD)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
DALY, Chief Judge.
Petitioner is an inmate at the Federal Correctional Institution at Danbury, Connecticut. In his petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, he claims that defendants improperly calculated and revoked his parole. The Court issued an order to show cause why the relief sought in the petition should not be granted, and respondents have filed a response thereto. Thereafter, the Court heard oral argument on the petition, and the parties filed supplementary briefs. Petitioner is represented by counsel.
BACKGROUND
O…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Moody v. DaggettSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Steven Guerra v. Edwin Meese, IIICourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- George Heath v. United States Parole Commission and Robert Henderson, Superintendent of Auburn Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Sims v. RivesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
- James L. Tatum v. Robert ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jimmy Lee Penix v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Penix v. U.S. Parole Com'nCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Richardson v. LutherCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989