Legal Opinion

Jimmy Lee Penix v. United States Parole Commission

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 21, 1992No. 92-1364PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case, Petitioner-Appellant Jimmy Lee Penix appeals the district court’s denial of injunctive relief against Respondent-Ap-pellee United States Parole Commission. Penix sought to enjoin the Commission from executing a parole violator warrant issued against him. The district court rejected Penix’s assertion that, as the Commission failed to hold a hearing within five years following the commencement of his parole term, that term automatically expired — as did the Commission’s jurisdiction over him. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Penix was convicted…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Board of Pardons v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Conklin Wallace v. Robert ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Society of Separationists, Inc. v. Guy Herman, Judge of the Travis County Court at LawCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  5. James L. Tatum v. Robert ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. George I. Benny v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Mitchell v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  3. James J. Valona v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  4. Arnold Mitchell v. United States Parole CommissioCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  5. Berkery v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API