Legal Opinion

Clements v. Travelers Indemnity Co.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 20, 1991No. 27419-8-IPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, C.J.

The Travelers Indemnity Company

(Travelers) appeals the decision of the trial court on summary judgment that Robert M. Clements (Clements) is covered as an insured under the underinsured/uninsured motorist section of the policy issued to Clements' employer, C.R. Bard, Inc. (Bard).

In September 1986, Clements was injured in the course of his employment while operating a vehicle owned by Bard. He was not at fault. He sustained substantial and permanent injuries. Clements commenced suit against the at-fault driver. She was insured by Safeco Insurance Company and had liability limits of $100,000 on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Roger v. Estate of MoultonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  2. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. WiscombWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Eurick v. Pemco Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. City of Spokane v. Taxpayers of City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  5. In Re EatonWashington Supreme Court · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clements v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Galbraith v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  3. Koop v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  4. West American Insurance v. MacDonaldCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API