Legal Opinion

United States v. Atkin

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 8, 2002No. 01-3811, 01-3968PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sanford I. Atkin, a pro se federal prisoner, appeals in these consolidated cases, a district court judgment denying his motion to prematurely terminate his term of supervised release filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3583. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).

Sanford I. Atkin, a former attorney, was found guilty of twenty-eight felony counts related to a fraud scheme involving his work on behalf of a jailed pornographer…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kenneth M. Romstadt v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. Roger LussierCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. Sanford I. AtkinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. EtheridgeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  2. United States v. CarusoDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
  3. United States v. John HaleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API