Legal Opinion

Gibson v. Philip Morris, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 24, 1997No. 5-96-0521PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hopkins

Defendants, Philip Morris, Inc. (Philip Morris), Edward Giancola, Beverly Brock, and Charles J. Robinson (collectively defendants), appeal the trial court’s judgment and award of both compensatory and punitive damages in favor of plaintiff, Randy Gibson, on his complaint for defamation. Defendants contend that, in this bench trial, plaintiff failed to prove the elements of defamation and that the trial court erred in awarding both compensatory and punitive damages. We affirm for the reasons set forth below.

FACTS

Plaintiff testified that, on January 24, 1983, he was hired by Giancola, a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Bryson v. News America Publications, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Kolegas v. Heftel Broadcasting Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Kuwik v. Starmark Star Marketing & Administration, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Haudrich v. Howmedica, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Grace Ptasznik v. St. Joseph Hospital and Resurrection Health CareCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  2. Morris v. Harvey Cycle and Camper, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  3. Vickers v. Abbott LaboratoriesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  4. Schmidt v. Ameritech IllinoisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  5. Cianci v. Pettibone Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1998

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API