Legal Opinion

Spencer-Sturla Co. v. City of Memphis

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1927PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swiggart

This case was instituted by a warrant issued by the judge of the city court of Memphis, charging that the Spencer-Sturla Company had violated an ordinance of the city of Memphis, in that the said company, “unlawfully maintained or aided and abetted in the maintenance of an undertaking establishment or mortuary on a lot at the southeast corner of Union avenue and LeMaster street, in a district zoned as *B’ residence district, contrary to the provisions of said ordinance. ’ ’

The judge of the city court having rendered judgment for the city, the Spencer-Sturla Company appealed to the Circuit…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Kidd v. PearsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Spann v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Spann v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Zahn v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Riggs v. BursonTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Lombardo v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Ward's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Chayt v. Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
  5. Mack Phillips v. Montgomery County, TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2014

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API