Spencer-Sturla Co. v. City of Memphis
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swiggart
This case was instituted by a warrant issued by the judge of the city court of Memphis, charging that the Spencer-Sturla Company had violated an ordinance of the city of Memphis, in that the said company, “unlawfully maintained or aided and abetted in the maintenance of an undertaking establishment or mortuary on a lot at the southeast corner of Union avenue and LeMaster street, in a district zoned as *B’ residence district, contrary to the provisions of said ordinance. ’ ’
The judge of the city court having rendered judgment for the city, the Spencer-Sturla Company appealed to the Circuit…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Kidd v. PearsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Spann v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1921
- Spann v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1921
- Zahn v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Riggs v. BursonTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
- Lombardo v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- Ward's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Chayt v. Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
- Mack Phillips v. Montgomery County, TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.