Legal Opinion

Udhus v. Peglow

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1960No. 35273PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs Udhus sought to recover damages against the defendants Peglow for personal injuries arising out of an automobile collision at the intersection of arterial highway No. 99 (alternate) and Emander road, near Everett. The case was tried to the court. The court found that the defendant driver was negligent and that her negligence was the proximate cause of the collision. Relative to contributory negligence, the court found

“That plaintiff, Edwin Udhus, entered the aforesaid intersection at a rate of speed in excess of 35 miles per hour in violation of RCW 46.48.021; that said speed was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Welliever v. MacNultyWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Fallin v. FallinWashington Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. SchapiroCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  2. Keogan v. Holy Family HospitalCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  3. Hydraulic Supply Manufacturing Co. v. MardesichWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Pacific Supply Cooperative v. United Farmers Cooperative, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API