Legal Opinion

Hydraulic Supply Manufacturing Co. v. Mardesich

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1960No. 35294PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

In this proceeding, the Hydraulic Supply Manufacturing Company (hereinafter referred to as the company) sought to recover from the owners of the motor vessel “North Star” (hereinafter referred to as the owners) payment for repairs the company made on the “North Star” in the spring of 1956.

The owners’ answer denied the reasonableness of the 1956 charge, and affirmatively pleaded damages they suffered as a result of alleged improper workmanship in the company’s repair of the “North Star” in the spring of 1955. By “counterclaim,” the owners sought judgment against the company for damages for the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stewart v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Wolk v. BonthiusWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Udhus v. PeglowWashington Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fisher Properties, Inc. v. Arden-Mayfair, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Lovric v. DunatovCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  3. Esmieu v. HsiehCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  4. Seattle Totems Hockey Club, Inc. v. National Hockey LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. Seattle Totems Hockey Club, Inc., Eldred W. Barnes, and Vincent H.D. Abbey v. The National Hockey League, the Vancouver Hockey Club, Ltd., Northwest Sports Enterprises, Ltd., Northwest Sports Enterprises, Ltd., Counterclaimant-Appellee v. Vincent H.D. Abbey, and Eldred W. Barnes, Counterdefendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API