Pacific Supply Cooperative v. United Farmers Cooperative, Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
1Per curiam
— This is, in its essence, a fraud action tried to the court. This case (like many such actions) could have been decided either way, depending upon which witnesses the trial court believed and what inferences it drew from the undisputed facts.
The plaintiff’s evidence met only two-thirds of the recognized test in fraud cases: It was clear and cogent, but it was not convincing to the trial court.
Our examination of the record satisfies us that there is substantial and credible evidence supporting the trial court’s findings on disputed facts, and that those findings are decisive of the case.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stewart v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Ostiguy v. A. F. Franke Construction, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
- Kelly v. KellyWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Udhus v. PeglowWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Martin v. NeeleyWashington Supreme Court · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- First Security Bank of Utah N.A. v. Banberry Development Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
- First Security Bank of Utah N.A. v. Banberry Development Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1990