Burg v. City of Seattle
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSwanson, J.
Quaere: Does a writ of mandamus lie to compel a municipality to repair a street partially closed by a landslide and to restore 4-wheeled vehicular access of certain homeowners to their property abutting on such a street? We answer in the negative and reverse.
After waiting more than 9 months for the City of Seattle to repair the damage caused by a landslide which resulted in the partial closure of the street which provides the only access to their homes, residents of Perkins Lane West (the Burgs, the Silvermans, Adolph, Hartnagel and Lint) sued for monetary damages and for a writ of mandamus…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lillions v. GibbsWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- Sutton v. City of SnohomishWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Provins v. BevisWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Wilson v. Jefferson CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1862
- Boeing Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- SEIU HEALTHCARE 775NW v. GregoireWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- SEIU Healthcare 775NW v. GregoireWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Burg v. Shannon & Wilson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Burg v. Shannon & Wilson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- City of Bothell v. GutschmidtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.