Legal Opinion

State v. Ferrone

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 21, 1922PublishedCited by 73 opinions

Information charging the accused with having burglars’ instruments in his possession in the night season, without lawful excuse, brought to the Superior Court in Hartford County and tried to the jury before Malibie, J.; verdict and judgment of guilty, and appeal by the accused.

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.

The assignments of error concern two rulings on evidence, the failure of the court to charge as requested, to the charge as made, and to portions of the argument of the State’s Attorney. We shall take up these assignments in this order, and first briefly outline the nature of the charge and what its proof involved, with a short summary of the essential facts upon which the State relied. In this way the claimed errors in the rulings made and in the charge as given and as refused, will be more clearly understood.

This case was before us in 96 Conn. 160, 113 Atl. 452. The information is based on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. FerroneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  2. People v. . ConrowNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. State v. LaudanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
  4. Commonwealth v. McDermottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  5. State v. JosephSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. State v. LeecanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  2. State v. VitaleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  3. State v. MorrillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. State v. UbaldiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  5. State v. JohnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API