Legal Opinion

Herzog v. Cooke

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 27, 1923PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

The defendant in his appeal makes numerous requests for the correction of the finding. The case in our opinion is determined by the portions of the finding which the defendant does not seek to have materially changed, and the legal results flowing from which would not be affected if the changes sought were made. The matter of correcting the finding therefore need not be further considered.

The finding disclosed that in 1919 the plaintiff owned a parcel of real estate with a house and buildings thereon in Greenwich, and that in the spring of 1919 she had sailed for France and had resided there…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Twiss v. HerbstSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  2. Burns v. WhitfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cyphers v. AllynSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  2. Mersky v. Multiple Listing Bureau of Olympia, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Harper v. AdametzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  4. Kurtz v. FarringtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  5. State v. LoughlinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API