Legal Opinion
United States v. Martin Perez-Corona, AKA Martin Perez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 8, 2002No. 01-10461PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMPSON, Circuit Judge.
Martin Perez-Corona pleaded guilty to a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), illegal reentry into the United States after deportation. He had a prior Arizona State conviction for the unlawful use of means of transportation. The plea agreement he entered classified that offense as an aggravated felony. 1 With that classification, and applying the enhancement provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2), the plea agreement provided for a sentencing range of 46-57 months. Contrary to the terms of the plea agreement, however, the district court refused to treat Perez-Corona’s…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Moses Corona-Sanchez, A/K/A Enrique Sanchez-CoronaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Miguel Angel Flores-PayonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Javier Rivera-Sanchez, A/K/A Jose SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Miguel Trinidad-AquinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Pedro Velasco-MedinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Arteaga v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. LeniearCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Sergio Martinez-Perez v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Mateos-Sandoval v. County of SonomaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.