Legal Opinion
Mateos-Sandoval v. County of Sonoma
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 31, 2013No. C11-5817 TEHPublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO DISMISS
THELTON E. HENDERSON, District Judge.
Presently under consideration are two motions, filed by the County of Sonoma and the City of Santa Rosa, their law enforcement agencies and officials (“County Defendants” and “City Defendants,” respectively), which, taken together, request dismissal of all claims presented in this suit. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants in part and denies in part each motion.
BACKGROUND
This is a suit brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and California Civil Code § 52.1 raising challenges to various…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Frederick Jackson v. Michael BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Inman v. AndersonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Cuviello v. City of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2013
- Bini v. City of VancouverDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2016
- Smith v. Pierce CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2016
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.