Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Lipinski

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 2004PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

ORIE MELVIN, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, Glenda Lipinski, appeals from the sentence imposed following her conviction of driving under the influence (DUI), 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 3731. She raises several challenges to the constitutionality of Act 63 with respect to its provision for installation of ignition interlock devices, 42 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 7001-7003. After review, we affirm in part and vacate in part.

¶ 2 The facts and procedural history may be summarized as follows. During the early morning hours of December 22, 2001, Appellant was involved in a motor vehicle accident. The responding officers…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of Philadelphia v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Commonwealth v. MockaitisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Commonwealth v. RandalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Commonwealth v. MayfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Payne v. School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BerrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Commonwealth v. Garcia-RiveraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Commonwealth v. NewtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Com. v. Barnes, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Com. v. Bryan, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API