Legal Opinion

Payne v. School District

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 20, 1895No. Appeal, No. 80PublishedCited by 39 opinions

Appeal, No. 80, Jan. T., 1894, by defendants, from decree of C. P. Potter Co., June T., 1894, No. 353, on bill in equity. Bill in equity for an injunction to restrain the sale of certain lands described in the bill for arrears of school taxes, by the county treasurer for the benefit of the school district of Coudersport borough, and for a decree that the defendants refund to the plaintiffs the sum of $925.65 school taxes, unlawfully collected, and for further relief.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 80, Jan. T., 1894, by defendants, from decree of C. P. Potter Co., June T., 1894, No. 353, on bill in equity. Bill in equity for an injunction to restrain the sale of certain lands described in the bill for arrears of school taxes, by the county treasurer for the benefit of the school district of Coudersport borough, and for a decree that the defendants refund to the plaintiffs the sum of $925.65 school taxes, unlawfully collected, and for further relief. A preliminary injunction was granted. An issue being joined, the cause was tried before Noyes, P. J., specially presiding, who…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

There was no error in entering the decree complained of; and for reasons given in the opinion of the court below it should be affirmed.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by appellants.

2Cited by39 opinions

  1. City of Philadelphia v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Pennsylvanians Against Gambling Expansion Fund, Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Commonwealth v. NeimanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Stilp v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Spahn v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API