Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Randal

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 1, 2003PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

BENDER, J.:

¶ 1 This is an appeal from a judgment of sentence imposed upon William Jesse Randal (Appellant) after he pled guilty to two counts of Driving Under the Influence (DUI), 75 Pa.C.S. § 3731(a)(1) and (4), one count of Receiving Stolen Property (RSP), 18 Pa.C.S. § 3925, and the summary offense of Windshield Obstructions and Wipers, 75 Pa.C.S. § 4524. Appellant challenges the constitutionality of what is known as Act 63 of 2000 (Act 63), Ignition Interlock Devices, codified at 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 7001-7003.1 For the reasons that fol*1212low, we vacate that part of Appellant’s sentence…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GrantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Commonwealth v. MockaitisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Commonwealth v. SalisburySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Commonwealth v. SynoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Commonwealth v. HuckleberrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. OrellanaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. BowenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Commonwealth v. TannerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Commonwealth v. JacobsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Commonwealth v. CapleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API