Legal Opinion

Staton v. Brame

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 21, 1999No. COA98-1501PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDMUNDS, Judge.

This suit originated with an allegation that defendants mishandled and misappropriated funds belonging to plaintiffs. The issue before us is the propriety of the trial court’s order requiring defendant Samuel Thomas Brame (Brame) to provide testimony in the instant case. Although Brame previously had given relevant testimony at a deposition conducted as part of bankruptcy proceedings, he asserted his Fifth Amendment right not to respond to deposition questions in the case at bar. The trial court granted Centura Bank’s (Centura) motion to compel Brame’s testimony. Brame appeals…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  2. In Re MuddUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1989
  3. Al Smith Buick Co., Inc. v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  4. State v. HartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. PearsallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Harris v. Ray Johnson Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Bartlett Milling Co., LP v. Walnut Grove Auction and Realty Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  3. State v. MacKeyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  4. Powell v. City of NewtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. Hartman v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API