Legal Opinion
In Re Mudd
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas
Decided January 24, 1989No. 19-40806PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HAROLD C. ABRAMSON, Bankruptcy Judge.
Came on for consideration, Trustee’s Motion for Sanctions and to Strike Pleadings and Motion for Continuance (“Motion for Sanctions”) wherein the Trustee asked the Court to impose sanctions against Mr. Jerry H. Mudd (“Debtor”) under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37 because the Debtor, asserting his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, refused to testify at a scheduled Bankruptcy Rule 2004 examination, or to produce documents requested by the Trustee. The issue presented concerns whether the Debtor waived the right to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re SymingtonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 1997
- Staton v. BrameCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Scarfia v. Holiday BankDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1990
- Krasny v. Gi Nam (In Re Gi Yeong Nam)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- In Re LedermanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.