Legal Opinion

State v. Pearsall

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 7, 1978No. 784SC415PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

The sole issue raised by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in ruling that Linda Sutton Williams, having claimed the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, was not required to testify as a witness for the defendant.

Before taking the stand to testify in his own behalf, defendant called Linda Sutton Williams as his witness. She informed the court that she would not testify. Her lawyer was not present. She had been convicted of armed robbery of the clerk in the convenience store (as defendant was charged in the case before us) but her appeal was pending at…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Snyder AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Snyder AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Martin v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  2. Staton v. BrameCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. State v. HartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. BrittNebraska Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API