Legal Opinion

State v. Reynolds

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 29, 1969No. 1 CA-CR 169PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONOFRIO, Chief Judge.

On October 24, 1967, appellant Gene Reynolds went to trial for three counts of forgery. The jury returned a verdict of guilty as charged in the information for the crime of Forgery, Counts One, Two and Three. The trial court submitted to the jury two forms of the verdicts. Omitting the formal parts, they read as follows:

FIRST FORM

“We, the jury, duly empaneled and sworn in the above entitled action, upon our oaths, do find the defendant guilty of the crime of Forgery, Counts I, II, and III.”

SECOND FORM

“We, the jury, duly empaneled and sworn in the above entitled action,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Beard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Coyner Crop Dusters v. MarshArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Valley National Bank v. WitterArizona Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Sullivan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1957
  5. State v. HoffmanArizona Supreme Court · 1955

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. ClaytonArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State v. KnorrCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  3. State v. ParraCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  4. State v. SanchezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  5. State v. SanchezArizona Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API