Legal Opinion

State v. Parra

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 9, 1969No. 1 CA-CR 180PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEVENS, Judge.

Arising out of a single confrontation and a single closely-knit series of acts involving the defendant and Miss Frazee, the defendant was charged in a two-count amended information. Count one charged the offense of attempted grand theft and count two charged the offense of aggravated battery.

Pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-663, grand theft includes the “theft of money or property from the person of another.” See subsec. A, par. 2. The defendant not having been successful in his efforts was charged with an attempt. Pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-245, a battery is an aggravated battery “when…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. State v. VallejosArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. State v. PhillipsArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State v. WestbrookArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  4. State v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  5. State v. HuttonArizona Supreme Court · 1960

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. HoskinsArizona Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. WheelerArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State v. HowesArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  4. State v. BenninArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State v. HoskinsArizona Supreme Court · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API