Legal Opinion

Hereford v. Tilson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 4, 1946No. 5726PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STOKES, Justice.

On April 4, 1944, appellant John Hereford, and appellees, T. I. Tilson and his wife Ruby, executed three instruments, consisting of a lease contract, a bill of sale and an escrow agreement. By the lease contract, appellant leased to appellees for the term of one year from April 10, 1944, certain property located in Dallas and described in the lease as follows: “Lying and being situated in the City of Dallas and County of Dallas, State of Texas, and being the real property and buildings located at No. 1805 South Haskell, Dallas, Texas.”

The rental provided by the lease was the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wilson v. FisherTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. KeelingTexas Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Moss & Raley v. WrenTexas Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Corsicana Petroleum Co. v. OwensTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Krueger v. W. K. Ewing Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1940

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hereford v. TilsonTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Moore v. KirganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  3. Parham v. Glass Club Lake, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. Idalou Cooperative Cotton Gin v. GueCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  5. Roquemore v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API