Legal Opinion
Roquemore v. Ford Motor Co.
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided May 30, 1967No. Civ. A. No. 4-460PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BREWSTER, District Judge.
This diversity action arose out of a transaction wherein the plaintiff, W. H. Roquemore, was engaged by the defendant, Ford Motor Company, to negotiate for the purchase by it of a suitable site for a truck sales and service center in Fort Worth, Texas.
The respective theories of the parties are set out in detail in the pre-trial order, and they will be only briefly summarized here. The quotations in such summaries will be from the pre-trial order.
Roquemore’s theory is that Ford “hired him to act as its dummy or front man in acquiring a suitable site…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hooks v. BridgewaterTexas Supreme Court · 1921
- Kinzbach Tool Co. v. Corbett-Wallace Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
- Slay v. Burnett TrustTexas Supreme Court · 1945
- Johnson v. PeckhamTexas Supreme Court · 1938
- United States v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Light v. Whittington (In re Whittington)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 2014
- W. H. Roquemore v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Superior Oil Co. v. Pioneer Corp.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1982