Legal Opinion

Hancock v. Suzanne Properties, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 6, 1983No. 41-744; CA A26258PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

This is an appeal from the portion of the judgment awarding costs and disbursements. ORCP 68A(2). The issues concern the apportionment of costs and disbursements among the several defendants and the propriety of an allowance for deposition expenses and an expert witness fee. Only defendant West appeals. We affirm in part and reverse in part. 1

The trial court, sitting without a jury, found for plaintiffs and entered a judgment, which provides in relevant part:

“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that plaintiff shall have Judgment against the Defendants herein as follows:
“1. Plaintiffs are…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Welch v. U. S. Bancorp Realty & Mortgage TrustOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Kendall v. CURLOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. American Timber & Trading Co. v. NiedermeyerOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. RUTH ET UX v. HickmanOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Rogerson v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Guinasso v. Pacific First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. Freitag v. Dept. of Rev.Oregon Tax Court · 2006
  3. In re the Marriage of TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. North Marion School District 15 v. Acstar InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. Portland General Electric Co. v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API