Legal Opinion

Dahlin v. Amoco Oil Corp.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 26, 1991No. 45A03-8911-CV-477PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STATON, Judge.

Carl L. and Mary Dahlin appeal a grant of specific performance and an award of nominal damages on their counterclaim for breach of contract. Their appeal raises

*809eight issues, which we have consolidated and rephrased as follows:

I. Whether the trial court erred by granting Amoco Oil's motion for summary judgment on the issue of specific performance.

II. Whether the trial court erred in only permitting the recovery of nominal damages in the sum of one dollar for Amoco's breach of contract.

III. Whether the trial judge erred in not excusing himself for alleged bias and imposing…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Stevenson v. Economy Bank of AmbridgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Orr v. Turco Manufacturing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Briggs v. Clinton County Bank & Trust Co. of FrankfortIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Indiana & Michigan Electric Co. v. Terre Haute Industries, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Olson v. FraaseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Raess v. DoescherIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Young v. ButtsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. BlaylockIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Countrymark Cooperative, Inc. v. HammesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. BACT Holdings, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API