Jackson v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BOEHM, Justice.
We hold that a trial court may find a knowing and voluntary waiver of a defendant’s right to be present at his jury trial if (1) the defendant knew his trial date and (2) the defendant did not provide an adequate explanation for his absence from trial. We also hold that a trial court is not required to readvise a defendant of his right to counsel or the perils of self-representation when the- trial court revokes a defendant’s attorney’s pro hac vice status if (1) the defendant was advised of his right to have appointed counsel at his initial hearing and (2) the defendant had…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Crosby v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Jones v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Lampkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Art Hill, Inc. v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce DevelopmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Ronald B. Hawkins v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
- Gilmore v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- R.R. v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2018
- T.R. v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce DevelopmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.