Legal Opinion

Ronald B. Hawkins v. State of Indiana

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 2013No. 20S03-1208-CR-499PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVID, Justice.

When a criminal defendant fails to appear at trial, it is appropriate to consider whether or not the absence waives his right to counsel and right to be present at trial before trying that defendant in absen-tia. Such was the case here, where a defendant who lived in North Carolina arrived late for trial in Elkhart, Indiana, only to discover that he had already been convicted. Based on the particular facts and circumstances of this case, however, we conclude that trying the defendant in ab-sentia, without counsel, was not the proper course of action for the trial judge to take.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Poynter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Jackson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Sanjari v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Hawkins v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. J.A. v. Indiana Department of Child ServicesIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  2. K.W. v. Indiana Department of Child ServicesIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Tervarus L. Gary v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. C.S., Jr. v. State of Indiana Z.T. v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Clyde D. Lewis, III v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API