R.R. v. State of Indiana
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Slaughter, Justice.
At a fact-finding hearing where R.R., a juvenile, was not present, the trial court found R.R. violated his probation and adjudicated him a delinquent for auto theft and false informing. R.R. argues that (1) juveniles have a due-process right to be present at such hearings, and (2) the trial court violated this right by holding the hearing in his absence. We assume without deciding that R.R. is correct on the first issue and agree with him on the second. We thus reverse the trial court's delinquency determination and remand for further proceedings.
Factual and Procedural…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Rush; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Massa.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lewis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
- Bible v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1970
- Jackson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- Darryl Calvin v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
- Dennis Garner v. Gregory S. Kempf and Clerk of Vanderburgh County (garnishee)Indiana Supreme Court · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- A.M. v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2019
- Bradley A. Estabrook v. Mazak CorporationIndiana Supreme Court · 2020
- Bradley W Hobbs v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2026
- D W v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2025
- Edgerock Development, LLC v. C.H. Garmong & Son IncIndiana Supreme Court · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.