Legal Opinion
Siegel v. American Savings & Loan Assn.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 23, 1989No. A040504PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BENSON, J.
Appellants are the named plaintiffs in a class action. They appeal from an order dismissing the action after the trial court sustained, without leave to amend, the demurrer of defendants Citicorp Savings & Loan Association (Citicorp), and Citicorp Savings Service Corporation (CSSC) (collectively defendants) to the second amended complaint. The trial court sustained the demurrer on two grounds: (1) plaintiffs’ state claims were preempted by federal law contained in the Home Owners’ Loan Act of 1933 (HOLA), 12 United States Code section 1461 et seq., and by regulations issued…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. CoyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Mabry v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Gibson v. World Savings & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 2002
- Fenning v. Glenfed, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- Wells v. Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- David Merritt v. Countrywide Financial CorporatCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.