Legal Opinion

Waggoner v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 2, 1955No. 27210PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

on state’s motion for rehearing

WOODLEY, Judge.

The state’s motion for rehearing attacks as void Art. 534 (a) V.A.P.C., upon the ground that the provision for suspension of sentence therein contained is unconstitutional.

While the act of the 53rd Legislature which has now become Art. 534(a) V.A.P.C. refers to the provision as one for suspension of sentence, the power granted therein appears to be more in the nature of probation than suspended sentence.

In either event, the offense being a misdemeanor, the provision is not authorized by Art. IV, Sec. 11 (a) of the Constitution of Texas, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Snodgrass v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  2. Gilderbloom v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1954
  3. Snodgrass v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  4. Ex Parte HaydenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1948
  5. Ex Parte De Jesus De La OCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Smith v. BlackwellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  2. Ex Parte GilesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  3. Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1961
  4. Welch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1963
  5. Millman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API