Legal Opinion

Snodgrass v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 14, 1912No. 1513PublishedCited by 59 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Appellant was charged with the theft of a horse from O.T. Cline. When tried he was convicted, and his punishment assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary.

There are but two grounds presented in the motion for a new trial, the first thing being that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict, and the other is that the court erred in not submitting to the jury, at the request of defendant, the issue as to whether defendant had ever before been convicted of a felony, defendant having requested that he do so under the provisions of the law as passed by the Thirty-Second…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
  2. Waldo v. WallaceIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Wright v. DefreesIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Attorney General ex rel. Taylor v. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1853
  5. Columbus, Chicago & Indiana Central R. W. Co. v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. McNew v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  2. State Ex Rel. Smith v. BlackwellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  3. Ex Parte GilesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. Whan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. Dunn v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1999

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API