Legal Opinion

Reichenbach v. Sage

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1896No. 1711PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from Superior[Court, Pierce County.—Hon. Frank Allyn, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, J.

On the 8th day of October, 1889, the respondent entered into a contract with the defendants Sage & Stratton whereby Sage & Stratton agreed to erect and complete a certain two-story residence with a stone basement in the city of Tacoma except the plumbing and the gas-fitting for the sum of $7,450. They contracted that the work should be commenced on or before October 30, 1889, and that the entire contract should be performed as rapidly as possible consistent with durability and safety and should be completed on or before February 10,1890, that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dermott v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  2. Ward v. Hudson River Building Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Cotheal v. . TalmageNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  4. Clement v. . CashNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  5. Dwinel v. BrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1867

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Sheard v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Watson v. IngramWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Long v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Madler v. SilverstoneWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Wallis v. Inhabitants of WenhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API