Legal Opinion

In re Fellerman

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 15, 1906PublishedCited by 19 opinions

In Bankruptcy. On proceedings to punish for contempt.

1Opinion of the Court

HOUGH, ^District Judge.

In and prior to August, 1905, the persons proceeded against (who are father and son) were in business in this city under the firm name of A. Eellerman & Sons. In the month named, an involuntary petition in bankruptcy having been filed against them, a receiver was appointed and such proceedings were subsequently had as that on November 9, 1905, a trustee was appointed. Prior to the appointment oí a trustee both the bankrupts were examined in this court under section 21a, c. 541, Act July 1, 1898, 30 Stat. 552 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3430], and further testimony upon…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Gardner v. Michigan Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. New Orleans v. Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. In Re SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Drakeford v. AdamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Loubriel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
  2. Merchants' Stock & Grain Co. v. Board of Trade of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
  3. Ex Parte BankheadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  4. McDougall v. SheridanIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Melton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API