People v. Parchment
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The Supreme Court erred in admitting into evidence a recording of an anonymous 911 emergency call under the present sense impression exception to the hearsay rule. “As generally stated, the present sense impression exception permits a court to admit hearsay testimony of a statement describing or explaining an event or condition made while the declarant was perceiving the event or condition, or immediately thereafter” (People v Brown, 80 NY2d 729, 732 [1993]; see People v Vasquez, 88 NY2d 561, 575 [1996]). Such declarations are considered reliable “because the contemporaneity of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. VasquezNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. BuieNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. GladdenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. CasianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. GrantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. Jingzhi LiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. CrudupAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.