Avnet, Inc. v. Department of Revenue
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentGordon McCloud, J.
¶40 Washington’s business and occupation (B&O) tax falls on wholesalers “for *69the act or privilege of engaging in business activities” inside our state. RCW 82.04.220(1). The lead opinion upholds the imposition of this tax on two categories of sales that, in this case, were indisputably made by Avnet outside our state: national sales and third party drop-shipped sales. It rejects Avnet’s arguments that the tax on those interstate sales fell outside the reach of RCW 82.04.220, was impermissible under former WAC 458-20-193 (1992) (Rule 193), and violated the dormant commerce clause, U.S. Const,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Tyler Pipe Industries, Inc. v. Washington State Department of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- General Motors Corp. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.