Tyler Pipe Industries, Inc. v. Washington State Department of Revenue
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens
In Armco Inc. v. Hardesty, 467 U. S. 638 (1984), we held that West Virginia’s gross receipts tax on the business of selling tangible property at wholesale discriminated against interstate commerce because it exempted local manufacturers. The principal question in these consolidated appeals is whether Washington’s manufacturing tax similarly violates the Commerce Clause of the Constitution because it is assessed only on those products manufactured within Washington that are sold to out-of-state purchasers. We conclude that our reasons for invalidating the West Virginia tax in Armco also apply…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Maryland v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Bacchus Imports, Ltd. v. DiasSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by270 opinions
- Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Ore.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Fla. Dept. of Business RegulationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Quill Corp. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. HeitkampSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Jefferson Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
265 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.