Legal Opinion
Maages Auditorium v. Prince George's County
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided March 5, 2014No. Civil Action No. DKC 13-1722PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DEBORAH K. CHASANOW, District Judge.
Presently pending and ready for review in this case raising a constitutional challenge to Prince George’s County zoning ordinances restricting “adult entertainment” businesses is the motion for a preliminary injunction filed by Plaintiffs Maages Auditorium; CD15CL2001, Inc., d/b/a Bazz and Crue and X4B Lounge; D2; and John Doe and Jane Doe, for all those similarly situated (ECF No. 10), and a motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment filed by Defendant Prince George’s County (ECF No. 22) (“County”). The issues have…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- MJJG Restaurant, LLC v. Horry CountyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2014
- Antietam Battlefield v. HoganDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
- Association of Community Cancer Centers v. AzarDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
- Blankumsee v. HoganDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
- Catalent Pharma Solutions, LLC v. WoodardDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.