Legal Opinion
Ranta v. German
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided October 16, 1969No. 18-40306-2PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, C. J.
Plaintiff respondents Ranta and Knotek commenced this action by a suit on a promissory note for the balance due on a real-estate option. Defendant appellants German and Jervis admitted execution of the note in their answer and amended answer, and entered an affirmative defense and counterclaim of fraud in inducing the signing of the note and the payment of $5,000 as a down payment on the real-estate option. In the original answer and counterclaim appellants German and Jervis asked that the complaint be dismissed with prejudice, that they recover judgment for $5,000, and for such other and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
- Corinthian Corp. v. White & Bollard, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
- Puget Sound Mutual Savings Bank v. LillionsWashington Supreme Court · 1957
- Coleman v. Highland Lumber, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1955
- Millett v. Pacific Cider & Vinegar Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Brown v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
- Allard v. Pacific National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Michael-Regan Co. v. LindellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Ebling v. Gove's Cove, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1983
- Commercial Credit Corp. v. WollgastCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.