In Re Marshall
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Judge.
On 19 October 2006, Judge Helms convened a hearing at which Raymond M. Marshall (“Respondent”) was to show cause why he should not be held in criminal contempt for his conduct during a criminal trial over which Judge Helms presided. At the contempt hearing, Judge Helms found that Respondent’s saying “Lord” in a loud voice, in front of the jury, with his arms raised up, and in response to a ruling of the court was willfully contemptuous. Judge Helms sentenced Respondent to 30 days in jail, suspended the sentence, and placed Respondent on probation for one year. As conditions of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. AsheSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Clarence F. Fabian v. Christopher E. PontikakisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- In Re MarshallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- In re: EldridgeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019